Hardcoded Secrets

What are hardcoded secrets?

Hardcoded secrets are sensitive credentials, such as API keys, passwords, tokens, and certificates, that are embedded directly into application source code or configuration files. While this approach may seem convenient during development, it exposes credentials to anyone with access to the codebase.

Because code is often shared through repositories, collaboration platforms, or build pipelines, hardcoded secrets frequently lead to unintentional exposure. Attackers actively scan public repositories for these credentials, and even private repos can leak through insider threats, misconfigurations, or supply chain attacks.

Why developers still use hardcoded secrets

Despite being a well-documented risk, developers continue to place secrets in source code. This happens for several reasons tied to speed, convenience, and gaps in secure development practices.

Convenience during development

Embedding secrets directly in code is the fastest way to get applications running locally. Developers under time pressure often prioritize functionality over long-term security, treating hardcoding as a shortcut to bypass configuration hurdles.

Legacy practices

Older applications and scripts were often built without centralized secrets management in mind. These legacy systems rely on embedded credentials, and refactoring them to adopt vaults or automated injection can be complex and time-consuming.

Lack of secure integrations

In organizations without strong DevSecOps practices, teams may not have access to secure vaults or automated secrets management tools. Without alternatives, developers default to hardcoding credentials to keep delivery pipelines moving.

Collaboration gaps

When teams share code across repositories, hardcoding provides a simple way to ensure functionality “just works” for everyone. Unfortunately, this also means every clone or fork carries sensitive credentials.

AI coding tools introducing secrets

Generative AI tools are increasingly used to write application code and configuration files. If these models draw on patterns where secrets are hardcoded, they may generate snippets that embed credentials by default. Developers can easily overlook these tokens, leaving sensitive data exposed without realizing it.

Hardcoded secrets persist not because they are best practice, but because they reduce friction in the short term. The trade-off is long-term risk of exposure, compromise, and costly remediation.

Related Content: What is secrets management?

Risks created by hardcoded secrets

Hardcoding credentials introduces persistent risks that compound as codebases grow and are shared across teams, repositories, and third-party dependencies. Once embedded, secrets are difficult to track, rotate, or revoke, making them an attractive target for attackers.

• Unauthorized access: Attackers scanning repositories often find exposed credentials that grant direct access to databases, APIs, or cloud services. Even a single overlooked key can open a pathway to sensitive systems.
• Privilege escalation: Hardcoded secrets may provide broader permissions than intended. If a token or password embedded in code grants administrative access, attackers can escalate privileges rapidly and compromise an entire environment.
• Supply chain compromise: Secrets exposed in libraries or shared codebases propagate downstream. Once published to a package registry or third-party repository, these credentials extend the risk beyond a single application to every consumer of that code.
• Persistent exposure: Unlike temporary misconfigurations, hardcoded secrets persist as long as the code exists. Even after a developer rotates the credential, the old version remains in version control history, leaving a permanent trail for attackers to exploit.

Related Content: Detecting secrets in code is a feature, not a solution

How to detect hardcoded secrets early in development

The earlier hardcoded secrets are identified, the easier they are to remediate before code reaches production. Developers rely on a mix of automated tools, IDE plugins, and pipeline checks to surface credentials as they’re introduced.

Pre-commit hooks in Git

Developers use tools like pre-commit or Husky to scan staged changes before they’re committed. Rules can block pushes that include patterns resembling API keys, passwords, or tokens. This stops secrets from ever entering version control.

IDE and editor plugins

Extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, and similar environments scan code in real time. These plugins highlight potential secrets in source code as developers type, reducing the chance of credentials being forgotten in commits.

CI/CD pipeline scanners

Secrets scanners such as TruffleHog, Gitleaks, or GitGuardian can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines. If a secret is detected during build or deployment, the pipeline can fail, forcing remediation before release.

Repository-wide audits

Organizations often run scheduled scans across GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket repositories to detect hardcoded secrets introduced in past commits. This includes searching commit history, branches, and pull requests for sensitive patterns.

Cloud provider integrations

Some cloud platforms, like AWS CodeGuru and GitHub Advanced Security, provide native secret scanning. These detect exposed credentials automatically and generate alerts if keys are committed to repositories.

By combining local developer tools with organization-wide scanning, teams can detect hardcoded secrets at multiple checkpoints in the development lifecycle, reducing the likelihood of accidental leaks.

Best practices to remove hardcoded secrets and prevent recurrence

Eliminating hardcoded credentials is a two-part effort: contain and clean up what already leaked, then change workflows so it doesn’t happen again. The practices below reflect what engineering teams commonly do in real projects.

Related Content: Secrets security in code

Contain and rotate immediately

As soon as a secret appears in a commit, treat it as compromised. Revoke or rotate it at the issuer (cloud provider, database, IdP), update dependent services to the new value, and invalidate any sessions that used the exposed key. This closes the active exploit window fast.

Purge repository history safely

Secrets linger in Git history even after a “fix” commit. Use standard approaches to rewrite history and remove blobs:

• git filter-repo (recommended) to delete files or patterns across history.
• BFG Repo-Cleaner for large repos where speed matters.
  After the rewrite, force-push and ask collaborators to re-clone to avoid reintroducing the secret via old refs.

Move secrets out of code and configs

Adopt a vault or managed secret store and inject credentials at runtime via the platform (e.g., GitHub Actions/GitLab CI secrets, Kubernetes Secrets/Sealed Secrets, cloud secret managers). Avoid baking secrets into images, layers, or .env files committed to version control. Use .gitignore for local-only files and verify build args don’t echo values into logs.

Enforce pipeline and IDE guardrails

Catch issues where they start and where they ship:

• Pre-commit hooks like pre-commit + Gitleaks to block commits that match secret patterns.
• IDE plugins (VS Code / JetBrains) that flag candidate secrets inline.
• CI gates that fail the build on findings and require rotation before merge.
• Repository protections, such as push protection/secret scanning features to prevent known token formats from landing in default branches.

Prefer short‑lived, narrowly scoped credentials

Use ephemeral tokens (OIDC federation, short TTL API tokens) and least-privilege scopes. Short lifetimes reduce the blast radius if a secret ever leaks, and fine-grained scopes limit what an attacker can do.

Validate continuously with organization‑wide scans

Schedule recurring scans across all repos, branches, and PRs, including commit history. Monitor CI/CD logs and artifact stores for accidental echoes. Maintain a runbook for “secret exposure response” so teams can execute rotation, purge, and verification steps consistently.

Related Content: What is secrets management?