Incident Response

Back to glossary

What is incident response?

Incident response is the structured process organizations follow to detect, analyze, contain, and remediate security incidents. The goal is to minimize damage, restore operations quickly, and learn from events to strengthen defenses.

An incident could be anything from a phishing attack to a ransomware infection or a supply chain compromise. Without a plan, response is chaotic and reactive. With a defined incident response plan, teams can follow consistent procedures that reduce business disruption and regulatory impact.

This discipline is a cornerstone of secure software development, since even well-protected applications must be prepared for inevitable threats.

Stages of an effective incident response plan

An incident response plan defines specific stages that guide teams from detection through recovery. A common framework includes:

Preparation

Teams establish policies, playbooks, and training before an incident occurs. This includes defining roles, setting communication channels, and preparing detection tools.

Identification

Incidents are detected through monitoring systems, alerts, or user reports. At this stage, it is critical to verify whether suspicious activity truly constitutes a security incident response scenario.

Containment

The immediate goal is to stop the spread of an attack. Short-term containment may involve isolating affected systems, while long-term containment focuses on preventing recurrence.

Eradication

After containment, the root cause must be removed. This could mean patching vulnerabilities, revoking compromised credentials, or cleaning malware.

Recovery

Systems are restored to normal operation. This may involve re-imaging machines, validating configurations, and monitoring for signs of reinfection.

Lessons learned

A review identifies what went well, where delays occurred, and what improvements should be made. Lessons are incorporated into policies to improve future readiness.

Related Content: Why SDLC and DevSecOps are moving to a continuous and simultaneous model

Common challenges in cyber incident response

Even mature organizations encounter obstacles when executing cyber incident response. Typical challenges include:

  • Alert fatigue: Security teams face overwhelming volumes of alerts, which can obscure real threats.
  • Coordination breakdowns: Without predefined roles, handoffs between IT, security, and legal teams become slow and error-prone.
  • Lack of visibility: Blind spots in cloud environments, third-party services, or shadow IT make detection and containment harder.
  • Resource constraints: Smaller organizations may lack 24/7 coverage or the tooling required for effective monitoring.

Addressing these challenges often requires improved automation and tighter integration between tools. Context-aware platforms reduce noise by correlating findings with actual risk to applications and infrastructure. 

Related Content: What is software supply chain risk management?

How teams can integrate incident response into DevSecOps

Integrating incident response into DevSecOps ensures that response capabilities evolve alongside development and deployment pipelines. This integration includes:

  • Shift-left monitoring: Building detection capabilities into CI/CD pipelines allows suspicious changes, like hardcoded secrets or risky dependencies, to be flagged before production.
  • Automation: Using orchestration tools to trigger playbooks accelerates incident response steps like containment and eradication.
  • Feedback loops: Post-incident lessons inform development practices, reducing recurrence of similar vulnerabilities.
  • Cross-team alignment: Developers, operations, and security teams share ownership of response processes, ensuring speed and accountability.

Organizations that embed response capabilities across the lifecycle benefit from tighter feedback loops and reduced downtime. 

Related Content: What is application detection and response (ADR)?

Best practices to improve incident response effectiveness

Organizations can strengthen incident response by applying proven best practices:

  • Run tabletop exercises: Simulated incidents test readiness and reveal gaps in playbooks.
  • Maintain up-to-date runbooks: Clear documentation ensures consistent execution of procedures.
  • Measure performance: Metrics like mean time to detect (MTTD) and mean time to respond (MTTR) provide visibility into effectiveness.
  • Integrate with supply chain security: Linking incident response with application and supply chain risk programs ensures broader visibility across modern attack vectors.
  • Adopt layered defenses: Combining monitoring, endpoint security, and threat intelligence strengthens detection and response capabilities.

These practices ensure organizations not only react faster but also evolve their overall security posture.

Integrating incident response with DevSecOps pipelines

Modern teams increasingly embed incident response steps into DevSecOps workflows. Automated alerting ensures suspicious events trigger containment playbooks. 

Infrastructure-as-code scanning detects misconfigurations before they cause incidents. Continuous monitoring connects logs, runtime alerts, and code owners, enabling faster coordination. By shifting incident response into pipelines, organizations reduce response times and improve containment. 

This integration transforms response from an afterthought into a proactive, codified part of the development lifecycle.

Frequently asked questions

Who should be part of an incident response team?

An effective team includes security analysts, IT operations, developers, legal counsel, and communications staff. Each role supports different aspects of detection, containment, recovery, and stakeholder communication.

How often should incident response plans be tested or updated?

Plans should be reviewed at least annually and after any major incident. Regular testing ensures procedures remain aligned with evolving threats and organizational changes.

What key metrics help measure incident response performance?

Common metrics include mean time to detect (MTTD), mean time to respond (MTTR), and percentage of incidents contained within a defined SLA.

How can API-driven tools speed up response coordination?

APIs allow orchestration across monitoring, ticketing, and remediation platforms. This reduces manual steps and accelerates communication between teams during active incidents.

What steps should follow containment in a security incident?

After containment, teams eradicate the root cause, recover systems to normal operation, and conduct lessons learned to improve future readiness.

Back to glossary
See Apiiro in action
Meet with our team of application security experts and learn how Apiiro is transforming the way modern applications and software supply chains are secured. Supporting the world’s brightest application security and development teams: