Cookies Notice
This site uses cookies to deliver services and to analyze traffic.
📣 New: Apiiro launches AI SAST
The majority of modern software development relies on third-party components and tools. While this sprawling ecosystem can streamline workflows and accelerate timelines, it also greatly increases an application’s potential attack surface.
Software supply chain risk management is a holistic approach to securing an application’s external dependencies, which may include:
Each of these third-party components may contain misconfigurations or vulnerabilities that bad actors may exploit.
The software supply chain is both increasingly vulnerable to attack and increasingly attractive to threat actors. Instead of targeting a single organization or entity, they can attack multiple targets through a single poisoned or compromised component. Legacy security software isn’t built to address vulnerable dependencies, meaning these attacks are often difficult to detect.
High-profile incidents such as the SolarWinds hack and vulnerabilities such as Log4J are examples of how much damage a software supply chain attack may cause.
Cognizant of this, emerging security regulations such as the US Executive Order on Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity directly require practices such as Software Composition Analysis (SCA).
The threats and vulnerabilities in an organization’s software ecosystem typically fall under one of the following categories:
A comprehensive secure software development framework that addresses both internal and external risks requires the following steps:
Create a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) that includes every third-party component in your application ecosystem, including transitive dependencies. Use supply chain risk management software to keep the SBOM up-to-date and flag outdated or vulnerable dependencies.
Apply the least dependency principle, removing unnecessary or redundant components from your build pipeline.
Establish clear policies around:
Employ software that allows you to enforce the policies above through a combination of supplier management, risk management, and compliance management functionality.
Leverage automated SCA analysis software to identify potential vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and threats within your supply chain. Ideally, this should be integrated into a holistic security strategy — one supported by an Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) platform.
Incorporate safeguards such as integrity verification, code scanning, and automated vulnerability notifications directly into your Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). Every time a developer initiates a pull request or attempts to introduce a new component, it should trigger an automated review.
Because of the collaborative, community-based approach to development, open-source software tends to be more vulnerable to bad actors, who may either poison the codebase of a third-party component or upload a malicious copy. This is exacerbated by a lack of sole accountability for addressing OSS vulnerabilities and the complexities of open-source license management.
Vendor risk assessments are an essential part of securing the software supply chain. Even if a component or tool is secure on paper, bad practices by its distributor can still put your business at risk. Ensure that each third-party organization in your ecosystem meets your standards for secure software development, incident response processes, and regulatory compliance.
No risk can be fully eliminated. However, you can reduce both the impact of supply chain risks and the chance they’ll be exploited by threat actors by employing the right security tools, minimizing your dependencies, and implementing the right policies and processes.
As often as necessary to ensure you maintain a complete understanding of your third-party dependencies and suppliers.
That said, while it largely depends on your industry, a complete assessment should be carried out at least once per year. Assessments should also trigger whenever a change occurs in your ecosystem, such as the introduction of a new vendor or a process update. Continuous, automated monitoring can greatly reduce the workload associated with these assessments.