Cookies Notice
This site uses cookies to deliver services and to analyze traffic.
📣 Guardian Agent: Guard AI-generated code
Agentic AI security refers to the principles, practices, and controls used to govern and safeguard AI systems that act autonomously toward defined goals.
These systems, often referred to as agentic AI, can initiate actions, adapt to feedback, and make decisions with minimal human prompting. Securing them requires a rethinking of traditional cybersecurity models.
Related Content: What is Agentic AI?
Unlike rule-based AI or machine learning models that operate within narrowly defined parameters, agentic AI can access tools, invoke APIs, chain multiple actions together, and interact with dynamic environments.
These capabilities introduce both power and unpredictability, making oversight, constraint, and monitoring essential for long-term success.
Most AI security practices focus on model integrity, data leakage, and adversarial inputs. While those concerns still apply, agentic AI introduces additional risks:
Securing agentic AI systems requires controls at multiple levels, including: prompt governance, execution monitoring, action filtering, and identity management.
Traditional perimeter security is no longer enough when the “actor” is code that can think, act, and self-modify across environments.
Agentic AI is beginning to power everything from code generation assistants to cloud automation agents and autonomous security bots.
As these systems scale, so too do the risks. At Black Hat 2024, Apiiro’s CEO, Idan Plotnik, explored how AI-powered, code-to-runtime software is critical to securing modern, fast-moving development environments.
Key talking points included:
Agentic AI systems operate with a level of independence that can blur the lines between code execution and decision-making. This makes governance a foundational element of agentic AI security.
Governance defines how agentic AI systems are directed, monitored, and held accountable for their actions. It spans written policies, technical controls, oversight mechanisms, and escalation paths, all designed to ensure autonomous systems operate within approved boundaries and align with organizational intent.
The first step in governance is defining what the agent is allowed to do and under what conditions. This typically includes:
Without this upfront constraint, agents may explore unintended paths, generate misleading outputs, trigger unauthorized actions, or become stuck in infinite, token-consuming loops.
Autonomous systems should never be black boxes. Governance frameworks must include action logging, decision traceability, and the ability to audit outcomes. This allows teams to:
Logs also support regulatory compliance and incident response, particularly when AI decisions affect customer data, financial operations, or security posture.
Even in highly automated environments, human-in-the-loop oversight remains essential. Organizations should define thresholds where human approval is required, especially for:
Effective governance enables safe, reliable autonomy by aligning agentic AI behavior with organizational goals and acceptable risk levels. When designed thoughtfully, governance supports innovation while maintaining control and accountability.
Agentic AI systems introduce a distinct set of security challenges that extend beyond traditional AI or software threats.
These systems are designed to act independently, chain together tasks, and adapt in real time. And while all of these capabilities can increase their utility, they can also introduce unpredictability.
Here are a few key risks commonly associated with agentic AI:
Agentic AI agents often have access to tools, environments, and APIs that allow them to execute complex workflows. If not properly constrained, these agents can:
This creates security concerns when actions are taken without adequate guardrails, particularly in production environments or systems with broad access privileges.
Agents trained or configured in one environment may behave differently when deployed elsewhere.
Shifts in data availability, access permissions, or tool configurations can produce unexpected outputs or decisions. These inconsistencies make it difficult to apply static threat models or fully anticipate agent behavior.
Without tightly scoped permissions, agentic AI may access or modify sensitive systems, such as authentication layers, cloud infrastructure, or customer data.
Even well-intentioned actions can lead to exposure, misconfiguration, or policy violations if safeguards aren’t in place.
Agents often rely on third-party tools, plugins, and APIs. Compromises in these external dependencies, whether through malicious updates, data poisoning, or insecure integrations, can cascade into the agent’s behavior and downstream systems.
Agentic AI systems often make decisions through multi-step reasoning and tool use, which can be difficult to trace. Without clear logging and transparency, security teams may struggle to understand why an agent took a specific action, complicating audits and incident response.
Anthropic’s Project VEND is a great example of this. In the experiment, their AI assistant Claude was tasked with running a fictional vending machine business. Despite receiving simple objectives, Claude began making unsupervised decisions, such as changing prices and manipulating inventory, far beyond its initial scope.
This scenario highlights the need for explainability mechanisms that reveal how autonomous systems reason and act, particularly when security or operational boundaries are at risk.
Agentic AI security addresses the behavior of systems that act autonomously across tasks, tools, and environments. Unlike traditional AI models, agentic systems can initiate actions independently, requiring deeper oversight, execution constraints, and explainability to ensure safe, bounded behavior.
Governance involves defining agent capabilities, monitoring behavior, and establishing control, such as human approval paths, logging, and access limits. Organizations can also apply structured testing, role-based permissions, and continuous audits to ensure that AI actions align with business goals and compliance standards.
Common issues include unbounded access to sensitive systems, unsafe tool chaining, inconsistent behavior across environments, and reliance on insecure third-party integrations. These vulnerabilities can lead to misconfigurations, data exposure, or loss of control if not properly mitigated.
When governed appropriately, agentic AI can enhance security by automating detection, response, and policy enforcement. It can monitor systems in real-time, respond to incidents more quickly, and reduce manual workload, freeing up human teams to focus on complex or strategic decisions.